Are We Toast

Or, do We have the Time and Wisdom to Protect our Planet's Climate?

 
Social Challenges PDF Print E-mail

 

The fundamental demographic disparity between the developed and the developing nations presents extremely difficult cultural, technical and moral challenges to any attempt to manage global climate change. For example, in 2002 the International Energy Agency reported(4) that 1.6 billion people, or 25% of the worlds population, did not have access to electricity and 2.4 billion rely on primitive biomass for cooking and heating; with dire economic, health, and environmental impacts.

The economic development of nations requires an abundant supply of affordable and well distributed electric energy. In most instances, the fuel of choice is coal. Additionally, a number of developing nations rely heavily upon hydroelectric power, whose water source is derived from equatorial glacier melt water. For example over 50%(1) of Kenya’s electricity is generated by hydro plants on the Tana River which is fed by the Lewis Glacier on Mt. Kenya. The glaciers on Mt. Kenya are rapidly melting, and not being replenished. It is predicted(2) that these glaciers will be gone within 30 years. River Tana is also a major source of water for World Bank developed irrigation and other agricultural projects. On the Asian Continent, billions of people depend upon Himalayan Glaciers, which are also melting at a rapidly increasing rate. As in other locations, the increased glacier melt is resulting in a temporary increase of downstream flow, providing some with “evidence” that global warming is not a real threat. The Washington Post recently reported(3) that the glaciers that feed the Ganges River, in India, could be completely gone as early as 2030.

 


 

Do the 1.2 billion people who enjoy the benefits of living in a developed nation have the moral right to deny the 5.4 billion citizens of developing nations the health and economic benefits of industrialization and the required consumption of energy?

Do the developed nations have the moral right to deny 25% of the world’s population access to such basic modern technologies as electricity? Can we resolve the environmental impacts of electricity production and distribution throughout the planet?

Is it in the interest of both the developing and the developed nations for the developed nations to provide family planning assistance to the developing nations. Do the developed nations have the moral responsibility to do so?

Economic growth requires a reliable supply of abundant energy. In 1998 the per capita emission of carbon dioxide in developed nations was approximately 3.5 metric tons while in the developing nations it was only 0.58 metric tons(6). A 2007 study(7) showed that since 2000 carbon dioxide emissions have grown faster than the highest of the scenarios developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Do we have the time, and wisdom to lower the disparity between the developed and developing nations while reducing global carbon dioxide emissions?

As large populations become displaced by the effects of climate change (lack of fresh-water, failing agriculture, lack of livable habitat, sea-level change, abrupt climate change) do we have the wisdom and time to provide for an increasing number of climatic refugees? How do we protect resident populations from the possibility of infectious diseases carried by climatic refugees?

Do we have the wisdom to prevent societal breakdowns and warfare over dwindling water supplies, food, livable habitat or other resources?

Or, Are We Toast?


 

You must login to add weblinks, comment in the Blog section, and to participate in the Forum discussions.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register